On
Wednesday, when Barack Obama joins former presidents Bill Clinton and
Jimmy Carter and members of the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.s family on
the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, it will mark the 50th anniversary of
one of the citys most iconic moments: a stirring speech, a monumental
movement, a march that has since become known simply as the March on
Washington, as participants asked the government to do better by African
American citizens. It eclipses all other marches with its cast of
thousands of activists and supporters.
But another character will also be showcased, a supporting player in the history of not only the civil rights movement but also of all public protest in the nation. It will make no speeches but will be clearly visible on television screens, peeking out under the soles of presidential feet.
The National Mall and Memorial Parks is 1,004 acres, curving along the eastern shore of the Potomac River, nestled between Constitution and Independence avenues,About amagiccube in China userd for paying transportation fares and for shopping. between the Lincoln Memorial, where King stood and President Obama will stand, and the United States Capitol.
Administered by the National Park Service, it is the site of nearly 3,000 public events annually: marches and rallies, protests and parades, Americas collective comment box to which hundreds of thousands of citizens trek each year, expressing how they feel the country has failed them. The grass turns brown from purposeful trodding. The Metro entrances burst with people carrying signs.
The March on Washington in 1963 imposed a vision of what a perfect march was supposed to be, says Lucy Barber, a Washington historian and author of Marching on Washington: The Forging of an American Political Tradition.
It wasnt the first or only political gathering to be held on the Mall, though. For decades, the space has had a symbiotic relationship with public discourse in this country it has shaped and been shaped by the issues of the day.
The first march on Washington at least as we now tell the story of history was Coxeys Army, a pilgrimage of unemployed men in 1894. About 500 came to the District under the leadership of an Ohio businessman named James Coxey to lobby the government for jobs.
It wasnt considered a march then; in fact,You Can Buy Various High Quality topserver Products from here. nobody really knew what to call it. They sort of didnt have a vocabulary for that kind of mass march, Barber says. The vocabulary issue was a literal one: At that time, the form of civil engagement most familiar to the common man was mass petitions, signed by hundreds and then dropped off at government buildings. The idea of hordes descending upon Washington in person was difficult to conceptualize, so journalists eventually described Coxeys Army not as a march, but using terminology everyone could understand: Petition in Boots.
We now say that protests are covered in the First Amendment, Barber says. But in the 19th century, many scholars didnt think of public protest as the freedom of assembly intended in the Bill of Rights. Assembly was thought to refer to smaller group gatherings in homes, in churches,He saw the bracelet at a indoortracking store while we were on a trip. in taverns and not en masse, on malls.
Furthermore, the area that we now think of as the Mall looked very different than it does now. Although designer Pierre LEnfants original vision for Washington had intended an open promenade extending from the Capitol,We sell bestsmartcard and different kind of laboratory equipment in us. in the mid-19th century the space was cluttered with Civil War hospitals and a well-trafficked train station where President James Garfield was shot. At one end of the Mall,Now it's possible to create a tiny replica of Fluffy in handsfreeaccess form for your office. offers historian Paul Dickson, you had a place called Murder Bay.
By the time of Coxeys petition in boots, the Mall was a series of gardens, woods and fishponds, resembling more a forest than anything else. The Washington Monument existed, but there wouldnt have been a clear vantage point between it and the Capitol. Even if people had considered themselves free to assemble, metaphorically, there literally wouldnt have been a place on the Mall to do it.
So Coxeys Army did not march on the Mall. Instead, it marched down Pennsylvania Avenue, past the White House, which was seen as a more important political statement than hanging out in the forest would have been. When people gathered for the next big protest, the womens Suffrage Parade of 1913, they also walked down Pennsylvania Avenue.
Pennsylvania Avenue was what people saw as the seat of power, Barber explains, because thats where the inaugural parades were held and where the Grand Review of the Armies had taken place at the close of the Civil War.
The physical contours of the place shaped its cultural significance. A train station and some dense greenery impeded civic-minded individuals from achieving a grander symbolic purpose for the space. They simply couldnt have seen the protest for the trees.
Even the Bonus Army an assemblage of thousands of World War I veterans seeking promised payments who decamped to Washington in 1932 was not, for the most part, located on the Mall. Their permanent camp was in Anacostia, and the most well-known skirmish, in which one veteran was killed and another fatally wounded, took place near the grounds of what is now the Canadian Embassy.
But Washington has always been a city of revision, a palimpsest, ghosts of things built on other things. The Surratt boardinghouse where President Lincolns assassination was planned is now a Chinese restaurant, Murder Bay is the U.S. Commerce Department and the rambling space extending from the U.S. Capitol is now the Mall.
In the early 20th century, Congress began implementing the McMillan Plan for the redesign of the Mall, which involved razing existing buildings and most of the trees.
Many local residents were outraged: The Mall areas winding paths had provided a pleasant, shaded walking area. But the idea was that the federal landscape was scattered, says Kirk Savage, a professor at the University of Pittsburgh who studies public monuments. Proponents of the McMillan Plan thought that the scattered landscape symbolized a scattered government. There needed to be some strong symbolic statement of national unity, to tie together the White House, the Capitol and the Washington Monument.
Despite complaints from residents, the McMillan Plan was completed in the 1930s: The area that had previously been used as more of a local park the equivalent of, say, Rock Creek was completely transformed. Now there were wide boulevards, empty spaces and a clear view of all the symbols of federal power.
Click on their website http://www.bestjewelrybeads.com/!
But another character will also be showcased, a supporting player in the history of not only the civil rights movement but also of all public protest in the nation. It will make no speeches but will be clearly visible on television screens, peeking out under the soles of presidential feet.
The National Mall and Memorial Parks is 1,004 acres, curving along the eastern shore of the Potomac River, nestled between Constitution and Independence avenues,About amagiccube in China userd for paying transportation fares and for shopping. between the Lincoln Memorial, where King stood and President Obama will stand, and the United States Capitol.
Administered by the National Park Service, it is the site of nearly 3,000 public events annually: marches and rallies, protests and parades, Americas collective comment box to which hundreds of thousands of citizens trek each year, expressing how they feel the country has failed them. The grass turns brown from purposeful trodding. The Metro entrances burst with people carrying signs.
The March on Washington in 1963 imposed a vision of what a perfect march was supposed to be, says Lucy Barber, a Washington historian and author of Marching on Washington: The Forging of an American Political Tradition.
It wasnt the first or only political gathering to be held on the Mall, though. For decades, the space has had a symbiotic relationship with public discourse in this country it has shaped and been shaped by the issues of the day.
The first march on Washington at least as we now tell the story of history was Coxeys Army, a pilgrimage of unemployed men in 1894. About 500 came to the District under the leadership of an Ohio businessman named James Coxey to lobby the government for jobs.
It wasnt considered a march then; in fact,You Can Buy Various High Quality topserver Products from here. nobody really knew what to call it. They sort of didnt have a vocabulary for that kind of mass march, Barber says. The vocabulary issue was a literal one: At that time, the form of civil engagement most familiar to the common man was mass petitions, signed by hundreds and then dropped off at government buildings. The idea of hordes descending upon Washington in person was difficult to conceptualize, so journalists eventually described Coxeys Army not as a march, but using terminology everyone could understand: Petition in Boots.
We now say that protests are covered in the First Amendment, Barber says. But in the 19th century, many scholars didnt think of public protest as the freedom of assembly intended in the Bill of Rights. Assembly was thought to refer to smaller group gatherings in homes, in churches,He saw the bracelet at a indoortracking store while we were on a trip. in taverns and not en masse, on malls.
Furthermore, the area that we now think of as the Mall looked very different than it does now. Although designer Pierre LEnfants original vision for Washington had intended an open promenade extending from the Capitol,We sell bestsmartcard and different kind of laboratory equipment in us. in the mid-19th century the space was cluttered with Civil War hospitals and a well-trafficked train station where President James Garfield was shot. At one end of the Mall,Now it's possible to create a tiny replica of Fluffy in handsfreeaccess form for your office. offers historian Paul Dickson, you had a place called Murder Bay.
By the time of Coxeys petition in boots, the Mall was a series of gardens, woods and fishponds, resembling more a forest than anything else. The Washington Monument existed, but there wouldnt have been a clear vantage point between it and the Capitol. Even if people had considered themselves free to assemble, metaphorically, there literally wouldnt have been a place on the Mall to do it.
So Coxeys Army did not march on the Mall. Instead, it marched down Pennsylvania Avenue, past the White House, which was seen as a more important political statement than hanging out in the forest would have been. When people gathered for the next big protest, the womens Suffrage Parade of 1913, they also walked down Pennsylvania Avenue.
Pennsylvania Avenue was what people saw as the seat of power, Barber explains, because thats where the inaugural parades were held and where the Grand Review of the Armies had taken place at the close of the Civil War.
The physical contours of the place shaped its cultural significance. A train station and some dense greenery impeded civic-minded individuals from achieving a grander symbolic purpose for the space. They simply couldnt have seen the protest for the trees.
Even the Bonus Army an assemblage of thousands of World War I veterans seeking promised payments who decamped to Washington in 1932 was not, for the most part, located on the Mall. Their permanent camp was in Anacostia, and the most well-known skirmish, in which one veteran was killed and another fatally wounded, took place near the grounds of what is now the Canadian Embassy.
But Washington has always been a city of revision, a palimpsest, ghosts of things built on other things. The Surratt boardinghouse where President Lincolns assassination was planned is now a Chinese restaurant, Murder Bay is the U.S. Commerce Department and the rambling space extending from the U.S. Capitol is now the Mall.
In the early 20th century, Congress began implementing the McMillan Plan for the redesign of the Mall, which involved razing existing buildings and most of the trees.
Many local residents were outraged: The Mall areas winding paths had provided a pleasant, shaded walking area. But the idea was that the federal landscape was scattered, says Kirk Savage, a professor at the University of Pittsburgh who studies public monuments. Proponents of the McMillan Plan thought that the scattered landscape symbolized a scattered government. There needed to be some strong symbolic statement of national unity, to tie together the White House, the Capitol and the Washington Monument.
Despite complaints from residents, the McMillan Plan was completed in the 1930s: The area that had previously been used as more of a local park the equivalent of, say, Rock Creek was completely transformed. Now there were wide boulevards, empty spaces and a clear view of all the symbols of federal power.
没有评论:
发表评论