Friday marks one full year that the two parties came to a
$180-million-plus, 20-year agreement to use the energy company’s
“plasmification” technology to handle the city’s waste.
And to
celebrate, Ottawa and Plasco are expected to finally sign the contract.
At least Plasco CEO Rod Bryden thinks so. This time for real.
What’s behind the one-year holdup, when Bryden and council were in such a rush to approve this time last year?
“Two
simple words: due diligence,” said Coun. Maria McRae, who chairs
council’s environment committee.One of the most durable and attractive
styles of flooring that you can purchase is ceramic or porcelain tiles.
She says that the deal to eventually send 300 tonnes of garbage a day
to Plasco is a complex one, and the city’s legal team wanted to “make
sure every ‘i’ was dotted and every ‘t’ was crossed to minimize any risk
to taxpayers.”
Plasco will use its “plasma gasification”
process to turn Ottawa’s waste into a burnable “syngas,” a glassy inert
slag, and water, all for $83.25 per tonne in the first year, with
built-in increases for inflation after that. There’s even a chance the
city could collect royalties from the company.
McRae had
predicted back in May that officials would be signing on the dotted line
within weeks (while Bryden made similar promises as early as March).
The
councillor would not confirm the contract was being executed on Friday.
But once the long-awaited event occurs, she promised the documents will
be posted online as soon as possible.
Although the contract
should incorporate the major aspects of the deal council approved Dec.
15, 2011, a few changes are expected, including the location of Plasco’s
future commercial facility.
The city agreed to lease Plasco its
land at the company’s current “demonstration site” at Trail Road and at
3704 Moodie Dr. for a commercial plant, at a rate of $10,000 a year per
location.
However, Plasco now plans to build its new processing plant at the city’s so-called White Pit site,If you have a fondness for china mosaic brimming with romantic roses, near the intersection of Moodie Drive and Trail Road.
That change will require council approval and likely not cause too much fuss.
But
another Plasco request expected to come to council in the new year
should be far more contentious: the company will be asking for an
extension on its first deadline.
Under the agreement, Plasco
must meet certain milestones. The first is March 31, 2013, when the
company is “obligated” to start building the commercial plant and have
all necessary construction financing in place.
“Should Plasco
not achieve these requirements by that date, the City may, at its sole
discretion and with written notification, inform Plasco that it is
terminating the agreement,” according to a 2011 city report.
Bryden
indicated as far back as September that the company might not make that
March 2013 deadline, and the Citizen has now learned that Plasco will
certainly be requesting an extension. Under the deal, Plasco has until
2016 to ramp up to full processing capacity, but it’s unclear whether
the company will want that deadline prolonged as well.
Consider
what McRae had to say on the matter: “I can speak only for myself,
personally, but if I were asked to consider and ultimately approve an
extension of any deadline that had no risk to the city, then I would
certainly approve that.”
And that’s what most of the rest of
council will likely think as well. A six-month delay, they’ll say, won’t
cost the city anything.
That may be so. But for Plasco to be
miss its first deadline so soon after finally signing the contract will
hardly instil confidence in those who are skeptical that Plasco’s
technology will actually work. Indeed, in 2010 testing leading up to the
2011 agreement, the longest Plasco had operated its plasmification unit
was for six consecutive days. And at a recent public meeting, Plasco
officials explained that the company operates its unit in three-week
“campaigns” to address specific issues, such as efficiency or emissions.
It doesn’t appear that the company has ever processed waste on the
scale that it’s expected to under its commercial contract with the city.
In the past, Bryden has pointed out that he is not currently
under any obligation to handle a specific amount of waste from the city.
As for councillors, they seem to be only concerned that taxpayers are
protected.
That’s a good thing, of course. But meanwhile, time
marches on, and garbage piles up in the landfill. How long will council
wait for Plasco?
It’s already been seven years. In that time, no
one’s been seriously studying other technological options. The Plasco
deal is sole-sourced — the city never put out a request for proposals
for disposing of waste, something council could have demanded last year
before agreeing to the Plasco deal.
In fact, the only report
that councillors saw on alternatives to Plasco was released while
council’s environment committee was debating the issue in December 2011.
And that study contained obsolete information about competing
technologies.
City officials get credit for putting together a
deal that seems to shield taxpayers from major risk. But they haven’t
followed their own policies on procurement, nor did they conduct their
due diligence on this file.
"The tracking system we now have
within the facility allows us to track high value assets in real time
and helps us comply with our specialist statutory licenses," said John
Johnston, Health, Safety and Radiation Advisor at FMC Technologies. "We
are now entering Phase II to extend the tracking system to other assets
and production items within the facility. The tracking system is now
being considered by various sites within our global organisation to
assist with our production flow and streamlining throughout the
business."
The Boston Networks solution consists of AeroScout
Wi-Fi RFID Tags, which attach to the assets being tracked, and
MobileView software, which allows staff to quickly locate needed items
anywhere in the facility with an intuitive graphical user interface. The
system is tracking components used in manufacturing petrochemical
wellhead devices, which are commonly used to cap oil pipes on the
seabed.
Due to the environment in which the devices are used and
rigorously tested, the asset tracking tags needed to be waterproof and
ATEX certified. FMC is also using the AeroScout system to track assets
for which it is required to hold a license: the solution helps ensure
that FMC Technologies doesn't breach its licenses and automates
reporting for audits.
Boston Networks, a U.K. leader in the
design, installation and support of high-performance Wireless and
Intelligent Building Systems, was the lead systems integrator for this
project. It selected the AeroScout solution for FMC because it works
with FMC's existing Wi-Fi infrastructure, making deployment quicker and
easier.
"FMC Technologies has a complex production environment with special requirements,Whether you are installing a floor tiles or a shower wall,This is my favourite sites to purchase those special pieces of buy mosaic
materials from. making it even more important to have the real-time
visibility into its processes that AeroScout enables," said Janet
Chaffin, President at AeroScout Industrial. "We're proud of our work
with Boston Networks to help FMC gain the visibility it needs to remove
inefficiencies, streamline business processes and improve reporting. We
look forward to working with Boston Networks to further extend the
benefits of the FMC solution.A specialized manufacturer and supplier of dry cabinet,"
没有评论:
发表评论